Today I Learned

A Hashrocket project

Ready to join Hashrocket? Find Openings here and apply today.

Named bindings in Ecto (vs positional bindings)

Positional bindings in Ecto are meant to confuse when buildings large queries across several different functions.

query = Thing
|> join(:inner, [t], x in X, on: t.x_id =
|> join(:inner, [_, x], y in Y, on: x.y_id =

Using that query in another function might look like this:

|> where([_, x, _], x.type == "Articulated")

But what if the positions change? How am I supposed to know which positions are which when Iโ€™m adding to this query out of context?

Named bindings help tremendously here (note the :as option):

query = Thing
|> join(:inner, [t], x in X, as: :x, on: t.x_id =
|> join(:inner, [_, x], y in Y, as: :y, on: x.y_id =

Now I can refer to these things without knowing the position. If the position changes itโ€™s all good the additive where statement does not have to change:

|> where([y: y, x: x], x.type == "Articulated", y.feel == "Good")
Looking for help? At Hashrocket, we ๐Ÿ’œ Elixir! From our many Elixir client projects, to sponsoring the Chicago Elixir Meetup, to the source code for this application, we are invested in this community. Contact us today to talk about your Elixir project.